[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP packagefor original RaQ3...)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP packagefor original RaQ3...)
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Dec 4 10:42:02 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
JL> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 10:21:14 -0800
JL> From: Jeff Lasman
JL> I think "many" is an understatement; I urge you to check with
JL> some of the larger colocation companies today. And there are
Size indicates size, not necessarily correctness. :-/ Again,
the 6461 STP debacle is a classic example...
JL> definitely tradeoffs, since networks waste (perhaps use is a
JL> less inflamatory term) three IP#s, making small networks
JL> quite inefficient of IP space, which is becoming more at a
True. And those three-IP networks end up using a /29.
JL> premium. Nevertheless we are changing our model, at least
JL> partially because of the helpful telephone conversations you
JL> and I have had in the past.
IMNSHO, this will give you definite bragging rights, setting you
apart from [what I unbudgingly contend is] a flawed network.
JL> "Defect" is another inflamatory word, at least in my opinion.
JL> We've never had a problem from our model; thousands upon
JL> thousands of systems are hosted with the same model we use,
JL> and our model (indeed our network) has never been unstable.
That's banking on luck, though. Many get away with it, just like
not wearing a seatbelt. When it breaks down, the consequences
are severe.
JL> As I've mentioned in another post, I'm operating fully in
JL> accord with the last set of rules posted to the list.
JL> I play by the rules set up by the last list-owner. The new
JL> list-owner may certainly decide to change the rules; if so
Although I believe the post was pushing it,
1) If it's the first time in six weeks, I have no problem with
that.
2) If others agree with you, I'll drop it. Even if others do
not agree with you... I'll drop it due to #1.
JL> I'll abide by the new rules. I don't think any one of us
JL> (other than the list owner) has the right to change the
JL> rules.
Agreed.
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.