[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP packagefor original RaQ3...)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP packagefor original RaQ3...)
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Dec 4 10:26:56 2002
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
"E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> After sending this, I thought of something to clarify:
>
> * Many networks have the same problems. Many others who offer
> so-called "colo" are guilty of the same flaws. Still other
> people are at facilities that suffer from the same. This is
> bad enough.
I think "many" is an understatement; I urge you to check with some of
the larger colocation companies today. And there are definitely
tradeoffs, since networks waste (perhaps use is a less inflamatory term)
three IP#s, making small networks quite inefficient of IP space, which
is becoming more at a premium. Nevertheless we are changing our model,
at least partially because of the helpful telephone conversations you
and I have had in the past.
> * What really burns me is when one sells something despite known
> defects.
"Defect" is another inflamatory word, at least in my opinion. We've
never had a problem from our model; thousands upon thousands of systems
are hosted with the same model we use, and our model (indeed our
network) has never been unstable.
> * Add to that blatant promotion that flies in the face of the
> list AUP, and I've reached my limit. List monitors need to
> follow list rules, too.
As I've mentioned in another post, I'm operating fully in accord with
the last set of rules posted to the list.
> I'm picking on you primarily because of the last reason, and how
> it amplifies and exacerbates the previous ones. I wish you no
> ill will, and don't want to turn this into a bashing session, but
> how about "keeping it real" and also playing by the same rules
> that others observe and respect?
I play by the rules set up by the last list-owner. The new list-owner
may certainly decide to change the rules; if so I'll abide by the new
rules. I don't think any one of us (other than the list owner) has the
right to change the rules.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Internet & Unix/Linux/Sun/Cobalt Consulting +1 909 778-9980
Our jblists address used on lists is for list email only
To contact us offlist: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"