[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP package for original RaQ3...)
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP package for original RaQ3...)
- From: "Dan Kriwitsky" <list1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Dec 4 06:42:01 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
>
> I'm sure there are other vendors who are offended when
> someone advertises, yet they refrain. Nobody likes getting
> penalized for playing by the rules.
I don't believe it is advertising to answer a post. If the PHP package
that is the subject of this post were available for free, I'm sure there
would be no need to offer a commercial solution.
>
> I believe in giving free help both on- and/or off-list as
> time permits. When time runs short, let capitalism sort out the rest.
Maybe if you post your schedule, everyone can hold off answering
questions until you're available.
>
> This is the first time in a few weeks that I've checked on
> this list.
Ooops, I guess not everyone can wait a few weeks for help.
> Last time I was reading, you mentioned that most
> of your customers fit profile <x> and told someone "you fit
> right in"... again doing a disservice to all but yourself.
Good memory, for someone who only checks the list every three weeks.
That's a lot of posts to memorize.
>
> I can't speak to what's in between, and frankly lack the time
> and interest to check, but I get the same impression as Thom.
Yeah, check the archives for his posts. Quite the double-standard he has
for flaming. Seems he's the only one allowed to do it. I missed that in
the FAQ.
> If it were once in a while, I could understand. However, I
> also have gotten a rather negative impression.
You have some very selective reading filters turned on.
>
> Much of the time, people will indicate they are ready to
> become paying clients. In the cases where one feels
> compelled to give a bid on something, at least keep it
> off-list. I do. Others do. Please do the same.
When someone asks about a PKG that is only available for $$ what do you
suggest? They be ignored? Jeff mentioned the package is available from
him or the author. What more do you want?
>
> Quite frankly, I'm offended that you continue using the list
> to solicit customers when your network has known
> security/stability issues. (Correct me if things have changed.)
>
I'm surprised you can continue posting this as I thought you were in
jail. (Correct me if things have changed.)
> Cool it.
>
I see we have the new self-appointed list owner.
--
Dan Kriwitsky
Please reply to the list only. Off list replies are not read.