[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Cobalt RAQ 4 (Sending Mass Mail) Why not working.
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Cobalt RAQ 4 (Sending Mass Mail) Why not working.
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Apr 1 17:23:27 2002
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Diran Alemshah wrote:
> I'm not sure what version number your client is presently using, however I
> can assure you the program has worked properly since the day it was created.
> Granted, as with any new release with new upgrades, its always possible to
> find "bugs", which of course we fix when reported.
And yes, you worked very hard to make my client happy.
> >> However, the author's attitude (to us anyway) was that if he wanted to
> >> run Subscribe Me he should have a dedicated high-speed mail server if he
> >> was serious.
>
> That may be taken out of context, and unfair as such.
Perhaps. It is what you said, though. I probably still have the
emails; I save everything.
> Since a CGI process runs on the server side, the amount of available server
> resources depend on how many other CGI processes (and thus how many
> customers) are hosted on the same machine, and running simultaniously. If
> the server's resources are already near their limits, yes, it may be
> necessary to run a dedicated server if your list size can not be supported
> by your existing web server.
His list was quite large, and he was running it on a RaQ3. He still
runs it on a RaQ3, but it's a lot smaller a list now. We did throttle
down the speed quite a bit; I don't know if Subscribe Me Lite supports
that or not.
> An upgrade in server's RAM/CPU resources, or a limit on the number of CGI
> processes that customers may run would make more resources available, and
> thus keep from requiring a dedicated server.
That's hard to do on a RaQ, of course, so you're probably saying the
same thing. Or at least you are in my mind.
> We do, however, suggest to anyone serious about building a large mailing
> list(s) to use dedicated servers, as this guarantee's that the server's
> resources available are dedicated to your own uses only.
Diran I'm happy to see you on this list; and I really hope that your
program can work for both the poster here, and the others who'd like it
to work on the RaQ.
I'm sorry if you thought otherwise.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484