[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] SpamAssassin offloaded to another machine?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] SpamAssassin offloaded to another machine?
- From: Jeff Lasman <blists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Jan 27 13:32:00 2004
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Tuesday 27 January 2004 07:53 am, Greg Hewitt-Long wrote:
> Has anyone off-loaded spamassassin to a secondary machine?
Yes.
> I have a server I'm trialling NuOnce's implementation of SpamAssassin
> (http://www.spamassassin.org) and I like the results - however, the
> server load is amazing (not so much the base product, but I have
> added 40,000 lines of custom rules in the local.cf). Each spamd
> grabs up to 78Mb of RAM - so I'm thinking of off-loading the tasks
> undertaken by SpamAssassin to a secondary machine whose ONLY task it
> to run spamassassin and razor - has anyone done this?
We currently run our "http://www.spamblocked.net/" services on a 1U
server with a 1 Gig Pentium III processor and a half gig of memory.
We run an Exim mailserver with both SpamAssassin and lots of blocklists;
using Exim we can use block lists on a domain-by-domain basis, even a
user-by-user basis, and implement individual blacklists and whitelists.
> I'm thinking that I'll probably use or build a custom machine for
> this task, something cheap and cheerful, perhaps a colomachines.com
> box, perhaps a machine using AMD processors I have around - possibly
> building several machines using even lower specs and attempting to
> round-robin them if that's possible.
If you round-robin and use bayes you won't get the full benefit of bayes
unless you replicate your bayes databases between the systems.
> I'd be interested in the changes to the spamassassin config files
> here on the RAQs, and experiences of a choice of OS for the separate
> box - ie, linux/BSD etc.
We're still using RHL 7.3 as our base OS, but in the future we will most
likely switch to FreeBSD, or perhaps WBEL.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation
Our blists address used on lists is for list email only
Phone +1 909 324-9706, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"