[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] RAM for RaQ 550?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RAM for RaQ 550?
- From: "Thomas Petersen" <thomasp@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Apr 21 05:22:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Risk your box for 40$ ? is it worth it !
You need 133Mhz _Registered_ ECC memory. Acording to my dist.
I have add'et 256 Mb 133, registered ram from Kingston without problems.
/Th. Petersen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erica Douglass" <erica@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 9:26 AM
Subject: [cobalt-users] RAM for RaQ 550?
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for RAM upgrades for my Cobalt RaQ550 servers. I want to
> make sure I am buying the correct RAM.
>
> I went to Crucial.com first, as they are my preferred vendor for memory.
> Ouch! They say a 512MB ECC PC133 chip for my RaQ 550 is $132.99. (Link:
> http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.asp?Mfr%2BProductline=Sun%2BCobal
> t+Products&mfr=Sun&cat=RAM&model=Cobalt+RaQ+550&submit=Go)
>
> I then went to Newegg. They have a piece of Crucial RAM for $40 less,
> but it's not quite the same part (it says "unbuffered"). The page they
> link to for the ECC SDRAM is this:
> http://www.crucial.com/store/PartSpecs.asp?imodule=CT64M72S4D75
>
> Note that Newegg is selling that RAM for $95. However, it's not the one
> Crucial is recommending for the RaQ 550, and it does say "unbuffered",
> so I am not sure if it will work.
>
> Should I buy the cheaper RAM from Newegg, or should I go the safe route
> and pay the extra $40 for the recommended memory from Crucial?
>
> Erica Douglass
> Lead Web Developer
> Simpli, Inc.
>
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>