[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ3 & 2.4 kernel (link to unofficial release dead)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ3 & 2.4 kernel (link to unofficial release dead)
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Apr 7 06:58:15 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
FJ> Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:21:28 +0200
FJ> From: Frank Joerdens
FJ> ftp://ftp.cobaltnet.com/pub/users/thockin/2.4/
FJ>
FJ> which is dead however. Does anyone know if/where it can be
FJ> found still? Any ideas as to upgrading glibc?
Huh? I was at that FTP site last night. :-) As for glibc, I'd
just install a standard glibc... AFAIK, the Cobalt funkiness is
contained in the kernel.
FJ> Why do I think that I need a 2.4 kernel? - I'd like to have
FJ> stateful firewalling via iptables, advanced (policy) routing
FJ> (a.k.a. traffic shaping), and might like to put ipsec into
FJ> the kernel. I also want a custom kernel anyway since I'd like
FJ> to disable loadable modules for security reasons.
All sound good.
FWIW, I'd like to point out that policy routing is different from
traffic shaping.
FJ> What do I intend to do with it? - Run Apache, PHP, PostgreSQL
FJ> mostly.
If you upgrade the kernel to 2.4, read the instructions. Tim
Hockin's info explains things well... just make certain you use
_III images (NOT _V) and run ROM revision 2.3.x, where x >= 38;
2.3.40 is currently available, although I've not tried it.
I'm considering moving a RaQ4 to 2.4 kernel, due to what I'm
certain is a kernel bug in 2.2.16C33_III. I had no luck
attempting to merge Cobalt patches with 2.2.17; I've not tried
newer kernels.
Finally, STW for a general "upgrading 2.2 to 2.4" guide. Some
other elements, such as binutils, need to be at least a certain
version.
HTH,
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.