[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] tcp_wrappers smart?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] tcp_wrappers smart?
- From: Gerald Waugh <gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Jan 7 11:06:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Larry Smith wrote:
> INRE Re: [cobalt-users] tcp_wrappers smart?:
> > > ...but does tcp_wrappers understood 192.168.1.0/24?
> > > (ie. ALL: 192.168.1.0/24 --yes it's an example IP)
> >
> > No, you should use 192.168.1
> > That is for a /24
>
> OR
>
> you can use 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
> (write out the netmask) if you prefer so that you can be more granular
>
> EG: 192.168.1.128/255.255.255.192 (one half of the 192.168.1 block)
>
Isn't that is 1/4 of a 192.168.1 block? or 64 ip addresses????
Gerald
--
http://frontstreetnetworks.com | http://raqware.com
Front Street Networks LLC | Phone: +1 203-785-0699
229 Front Street, Ste. C, New Haven, CT. 06513-3203