[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] tcp_wrappers smart?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] tcp_wrappers smart?
- From: Larry Smith <lesmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Jan 7 10:49:01 2003
- Organization: ECSIS.NET
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
INRE Re: [cobalt-users] tcp_wrappers smart?:
> > ...but does tcp_wrappers understood 192.168.1.0/24?
> > (ie. ALL: 192.168.1.0/24 --yes it's an example IP)
>
> No, you should use 192.168.1
> That is for a /24
OR
you can use 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0
(write out the netmask) if you prefer so that you can be more granular
EG: 192.168.1.128/255.255.255.192 (one half of the 192.168.1 block)
--
Larry Smith
SysAd ECSIS.NET
sysad@xxxxxxxxx