[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP package for original RaQ3...)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] commercial list use (Re: [RaQ3] Need PHP package for original RaQ3...)
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Dec 4 10:17:58 2002
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
"E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> Last time I was reading, you mentioned that most of your
> customers fit profile <x> and told someone "you fit right in"...
> again doing a disservice to all but yourself.
I really don't remember what you're referring to, so I can't respond
now. If you had said something to me then, I would have been happy to
respond then. One of your clients told me you had a problem with me,
but neither you nor he would tell me what it was, so I had no way to
correct my behavior, if in fact correction was desirable/possible. Now
at least I have some indication. Thanks.
> Quite frankly, I'm offended that you continue using the list to
> solicit customers when your network has known security/stability
> issues. (Correct me if things have changed.)
Our network at Inflow has never had instability issues.
I understand there are possible security issues based on the lack of
private networks to each colocation and rental-system client, and I
understand your feelings about hosters having a private network for each
client, perhaps for each systems. Frankly, having considered the
tradeoffs, I agree with you. It wasn't our network (we've always shared
space at Inflow) and we always told our clients they didn't have their
own network.
But we're now building a new network at a new location. We'll soon have
private networks for each of our systems. The tradeoff is that it won't
be as easy for our clients to add IP#s; once they've used all the IP#s
in their network allocation we'll either have to replace their network
with a larger one, or give them an additional network.
In the meantime we continue to proactively monitor our current network
to make sure that possible security issues don't become real ones.
> Cool it.
I'm in compliance with the last posted set of "rules" for this list.
The post that started this admittedly offtopic discussion was the first
in which I mentioned any product of mine in probably somewhat over six
weeks. This mention was in direct response to a direct request for
availability information. Frankly, I consider that cool.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US
Internet & Unix/Linux/Sun/Cobalt Consulting +1 909 778-9980
Our jblists address used on lists is for list email only
To contact us offlist: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"