[cobalt-users] virtual site logs

[Mike Smith <cobaltdude2002@xxxxxxxxx>]

The disclaimer - I've searched to archives and can't
really find a suitable answer. I know someone is going
to tell me to RTFM.....but a little help here would be
great. I'm trying to determine if virtual site logs
are being rotated properly. Here's some info from the
/logs directory from one site:

drwxr-s---   2 nobody   site6        1024 Sep 30 00:27
.
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6      231733 Sep 30 00:27
web.stats
-rw-------   1 root     site6     5201471 Sep 30 00:27
web.cache.new
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6     5872333 Sep 30 00:27
web.log
-rw-------   1 root     site6      230023 Sep 30 00:27
mail.cache.new
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6      102704 Sep 30 00:27
mail.stats
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6     1176260 Sep 30 00:27
mail.log
-rw-------   1 root     site6      217097 Sep 30 00:25
ftp.cache.new
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6      199406 Sep 30 00:25
ftp.stats
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6     1470871 Sep 30 00:25
ftp.log
-rw-------   1 root     site6     5200114 Sep 29 04:04
web.cache
-rw-------   1 root     site6      217078 Sep 29 04:02
ftp.cache
-rw-------   1 root     site6      229786 Sep 28 04:03
mail.cache
-rw-r--r--   1 root     site6      997376 Sep 17 04:04
web.log.1.gz
drwxrwsr-x   6 nobody   site6        1024 Oct  8  2001
..

As you can see, some of the files are quite
large.....and though today is the 30th, the .gz file
was last modified on the 17th. Am I missing something
here (knowledge) or should these files be much
smaller? This is from a Raq4 with all updates/patches
(and unfortunately the SHP patch).
Thanks much in advance for your assistance,
Mike

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com