[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] PostgreSQL InterBase MySQL
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] PostgreSQL InterBase MySQL
- From: "Giovanni Premuda" <gpremuda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat May 25 18:37:01 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
----- Original Message -----
> | > PostgreSQL has support for transactions, which is very nice and is
ACID
> | > compliant.
> |
> | Ah, here we go. <g>
>
> Hehe - thought this wasn't going to turn into a war :-P
>
> Granted, MySQL *does* have transaction features - apologies if my original
> comments didn't make that clear.
> However, I think the general consensus is that PostgreSQL's transactions
are
> more established, just as MySQL's full text search is much better.
>
> Joel.
Oh, well, I tried to avoid this, I even aborted two messages, but I can't
resist:
Interbase transactions may span multiple databases, and you won't ever get a
deadlock as it uses a versioning engine so that every user has always a
consistent view of the database.
[I will try to keep my mouth shut (my fingers inactive?) after this one]
My list of Interbase resources will follow soon.
Giovanni