[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] PostgreSQL InterBase MySQL
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] PostgreSQL InterBase MySQL
- From: "Joel Baker" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat May 25 17:08:00 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
""Steve Werby"" <steve-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:<>...
| "Joel Baker" <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > I agree. On that note:
| >
| > PostgreSQL has support for transactions, which is very nice and is ACID
| > compliant.
|
| Ah, here we go. <g>
Hehe - thought this wasn't going to turn into a war :-P
Granted, MySQL *does* have transaction features - apologies if my original
comments didn't make that clear.
However, I think the general consensus is that PostgreSQL's transactions are
more established, just as MySQL's full text search is much better.
Joel.