[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Apr 3 11:30:24 2002
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Paul Jacobs wrote:
> Gee jeff, they make 1u and 2 u cases now that are around $100.00, true, it
> is hard to find old parts anymore to use in *nix boxes but, worth the time
> just so you don't get stuck with a box that does not work as
> advertised!.... and as for the power supply.... well all
> ball-bearing fan's last for quite some time.
Please explain two things to me...
1) where can you buy 1u cases for $100. I'd like to know about those.
2) why you consider "old parts" for a unix/linux box to be equivalent to
the new parts you get when you buy a Sun Cobalt RaQ.
> >There are network cards, and then there are network cards. If you're
> >running a 450mHz RaQ on a T-1 it really doesn't matter. If you're
> >streaming a lot of Real content on a T-3, it does.
>> Jeff, jeff..... that is the most UN-INFORMED statement I have seen anyone
> make on this list in quite some time...
I don't understand. Are you saying that $17 cards are as good as $195
busmaster cards with cache in terms of throughput? Or are you saying
that those $195 cards are important even for inexpensive machines
running low-end clients on a T-1? Please clarify.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484