[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Setting a Seconday DNS Server - Help Please
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Setting a Seconday DNS Server - Help Please
- From: "multivex RAQ" <johnny@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat Dec 22 18:08:10 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Dear Jeff:
Thank you for your answer.
Maybe I will re-establish what I am trying to do:
I want to prevent downtime in the case of a hard disk failure in my RAQ or
in case DNS problems arise.
I understand I can use a RAQ4r with RAID, but both would be in the same
location, so this does not seem to be a good solution in case something
happens with that entire network..
I have two RAQs, each on a different location. I would like to use the
second to mirror the first, having both actualized content. So in case one
fails, being the other the secondary DNS for the domain, it could take over
and continue serving.
How would you establish such a solution?.
By the way, something I do not have clear (or may be I am totally wrong, in
this case please help me to clarify):
I understad that Secondary DNS takes the content from the Primary DNS Server
Disk instead as from the secondary DNS Server Disk. What happens if hard
disk in primary fails? From where will secondary DNS take content?
Regards
Johnny
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Lasman" <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Setting a Seconday DNS Server - Help Please
> multivex RAQ wrote:
>
> > I have two RAQS and want one to act as a master and the other to act as
a
> > slave.
>
> ...<stuff snipped out of middle>...
>
> > According to the theory, both servers should be mirroring each other,
and
> > content should be updated on both when changes happen.
>
> According to whose theory <smile>?
>
> > But I am only getting the RAQ! (primary) content updated and not the
slave
> >
> > What am I doing wrong?
>
> Did you set up secondary DNS on the second RaQ, or primary DNS? Zones
> typically get transferred from the primary server to the secondary
> server. Not from primary to primary, or from secondary to secondary.
>
> I think you're trying to use DNS zone-transfer for something it's not
> made to do.
>
> You should probably be using a non-RaQ solution, and copying entire DNS
> zone files, or a semi-RaQ solution, and copying the RaQs domains file
> (sorry, I forget the name and I'm not running RaQ-DNS so I'm not sure
> <frown>) and running the Raq script to create the zone files after each
> transfer.
>
> Even so, how would you know which machine had the accurate records?
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
> nobaloney.net
> P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
> voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>