[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Ready to Migrate, Use CMU?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Ready to Migrate, Use CMU?
- From: Jeff Bilicki <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Dec 3 22:37:24 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> That certainly clears that up... jk. No, really... does 2.27 work the same
> as the old version, command and procedure-wise? Any caveats? New man pages?
> Does it fix the issues from the previous version? Is there a changelog or
> something to that effect. I know it's not an "official" release... just
> found your post in my searches and was hoping to get some info about it. I
> need to complete my setup and transfer my box to the new colo soon, and have
> been exploring transfer methods for awhile and can't seem to find a clearcut
> solution.
Version 2 was a complete re-write and fixed many critical issues, this release contains mostly bug fixes. Yes, it runs pretty much the same as the old version. You can find the some info about the first release of CMU version 2 here:
http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2001-August/050180.html
This version of CMU should be posted to www.cobalt.com this week. You can take a look at the release notes here:
http://www.bilicki.com/cmu/SCMU_v2.27_Notes_E.pdf
> I have had feedback relating to it being problematic... but then again did
> they use meta-verify.pl, etc? I was hoping you could provide some feedback
> on that.
meta-verify would only correct errors, running it would not impact CMU.
> From past experience and feedback thus far I am guessing I should do the
> transfer manually;
ok.
Jeff-