Re: [cobalt-users] Sanity Check Please

[Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

SteelHead wrote:

> Would a member of staff please answer (as an authoritative member of staff)
> the following questions?

I'm not a staffer; We're an independent Cobalt consultancy/support firm.

> 1.   How many sites (total sites) will the various raq models support
> assuming there is no traffic load on the sites.

The latest models support <> 250 sites.

> 2.    Is there a difference in number of sites allowed based on the tree of
> that site?  ie:
>         anydoman.com/~anyusers/sites
>         anyhost.anydoman.com/sites
>         anyhost.anydoman.com/~anyusers/sites

Your "middle" example is what I'm writing about when I mention the <>
250 site limit.

The top and bottom examples are the same, and these aren't exactly what
I'd call "sites"; they're personal web-directories of individual users.

The RaQ is designed for hosting <> 250 sites.  It is NOT designed for
hosting hundreds or thousands of low-bandwidth sites.  There are
solutions for those, and some of my friends and clients use those
solutions, but the RaQ isn't one of them.

Jeff
-- 
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA  92517
voice: (909) 787-8589  *  fax: (909) 782-0205