Re: [cobalt-users] cobaltracks - feedback

["Zahid N. Sindhu" <zahid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

For me, the page on the RaQ loads faster than the other one.

I agree with Jeff, Hirsh's connection to the two has defenitely something to
do with the problem he is facing.

Zahid N. Sindhu
Nexus Technologies,
http://www.nexus.net.pk/


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Lasman" <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] cobaltracks - feedback


> hirsh -e-skwirtz wrote:
>
> > we have set up the same set of pages, one at cobaltracks.com ' s web
server
> > at http://www.netblooms.net/browserAuto.htm
> >
> > the other at our leased virtual web space in minneapolis at
> > http://www.netblooms.com/browserAuto.htm
> >
> > the latter typically loads in under 6 seconds for me in minneapolis with
a
> > 258 dsl line
> >
> > the cobalt rack page typically takes as long as 45 seconds.
>
> Hirsh,
>
> For me they loaded at about 35 seconds each; the RaQ was a few seconds
> slower.  Perhaps your connection to the two sites has something to do
> with it?
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> nobaloney.net
> P. O. Box 52672
> Riverside, CA  92517
> voice: (909) 787-8589  *  fax: (909) 782-0205