Re: [cobalt-users] re: shared SSL on RaQ4

[Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Christopher Simmons wrote:

> Beside the point however, I do want to offer shared SSL regardless of
> the pros and cons. I always thought it was a nice feature and "isn't
> hurting anyone" so why not? If I can make an extra $100 - 200 month in
> hosting revenue simply by installing this feature properly (umm...
> "hack" properly) then it's worth it to me. Plus I was offering this
> service through that crappy hosting sweat shop ("CT").

While almost everyone offers shared SSL, the fact is that there is a
major "con"...

> Now that I'm bringing it all into my own 1/2-rack environment and have
> total power (nyah haha hhah!!!), then I hope to be able to provide
> better service to my customers.

Bragging ignored <smile>.

> Any compelling reason not to do it? (Shared SSL.)  Melt down, humidity
> on the diodes, LCD display failure, etc.? (kidding)

It's most likely against the license agreement you sign when you
purchase the cert.
-- 
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672
Riverside, CA  92517
voice: (909) 787-8589  *  fax: (909) 782-0205