Re: [cobalt-users] (no subject)

["Trevor Munday" <tmunday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Peter,

Here, here!

I think its down to personal preference really and as such there is no
'correct' answer.  So to ensure we don't offend anyone perhaps we should all
post the previous mail above and below ;-)

Trevor


----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Low" <peterlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] (no subject)


> Actually, I find it is annoying when the response is below the original as
> I end up having to do more scrolling.  I usually understand the context
> either because I have recently read the original or because the response
> alludes to the context in such a way that the original is implied.
>
> Apologies in advance for continuing to offend.
>
> Peter
>
> At 02:33 AM 8/26/00 -0400, you wrote:
> >"Trevor Munday" <tmunday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> ><big snip> His Response
> ><big snip> Context, (the question)!!
> >
> >Trevor,
> >Please put the context of the message first, then put your response
below.
> >It is very aggravating to read the "answer" (sales-pitch) to a question,
and
> >then read the question!
> >Other offenders please take notice!
> >Thanks,
> >Gerald Waugh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>