RE: [cobalt-users] (no subject)

["Jimmy Gross" <jimmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not using a "subject" is annoying as well.

jimmy

-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dan
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 7:48 AM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] (no subject)


> Actually, I find it is annoying when the response is below the
> original as
> I end up having to do more scrolling.  I usually understand the context
> either because I have recently read the original or because the response
> alludes to the context in such a way that the original is implied.
>
>
Not everyone reads posts in order, or in my case, receives them in order. On
this list, I often receive a reply to a post before I receive the original
post. IMO, it is common courtesy to answer questions inline so anyone
reading the post can understand what your answer is in reply to.
It also makes for less text necessary for the reply as the question is there
to read more like a conversation.

--
Dan Kriwitsky



_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users