Re: [cobalt-users] (no subject)

["Joe Quinn" <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I prefer it the way you have it, if people are following a thread, they
should already a grasp of the problem.

Joe Quinn
QITC
Free Domain Name Registration, Web Site Hosting, Co-location.
The Best Value Bar None!
joe@xxxxxxxxxx
Tel:    44 141 577 6919
Mobile:    44 776 737 1234

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Low" <peterlow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] (no subject)


Actually, I find it is annoying when the response is below the original as
I end up having to do more scrolling.  I usually understand the context
either because I have recently read the original or because the response
alludes to the context in such a way that the original is implied.

Apologies in advance for continuing to offend.

Peter

At 02:33 AM 8/26/00 -0400, you wrote:
>"Trevor Munday" <tmunday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
><big snip> His Response
><big snip> Context, (the question)!!
>
>Trevor,
>Please put the context of the message first, then put your response below.
>It is very aggravating to read the "answer" (sales-pitch) to a question,
and
>then read the question!
>Other offenders please take notice!
>Thanks,
>Gerald Waugh


_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users