Re: [cobalt-users] Colo says need scond server

["Gerald Waugh" <gerald@xxxxxxxxx>]

> > Gerald Waugh wrote:
> > > Get your ISP to set his nameserver up as a slave!

> > Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> > Yes, but the ISP still needs the list of sites to secondary, and that's
> > what the original question was all about...
> >
> Gerald Waugh wrote:
> I don't understand, doesn't refresh update the SOA records of the Secondary
> (slave) with the records of the Primary? And don't those records contain
records
> for the sites?
>
I just set up a RaQ2 as a Master (primary) and a RaQ3 as a Slave (secondary).
The slave gets updated automagically, Any changes I make to the Master are
updated in the slave without human intervention.
Now this may work differently on other computers, but the RaQ's do it!!!