Re: [cobalt-users] Colo says need scond server

["Gerald Waugh" <gerald@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 12:24 AM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Colo says need scond server


> Gerald Waugh wrote:
>
> > Get your ISP to set his nameserver up as a slave!
>
> Yes, but the ISP still needs the list of sites to secondary, and that's
> what the original question was all about...
>
I don't understand, doesn't refresh update the SOA records of the Secondary
(slave) with the records of the Primary? And don't those records contain records
for the sites?