Re: [cobalt-users] Here is a good question....

["WebMost" <rdavis@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ahoy

Can you please clarify what you mean by upstream/downstream?

Aloha

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Euliano <jime@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Here is a good question....


>>alternative to co-locating for small domains... and the cost for ADSL is
>>allot lower then a T1.
>
>There shouldn't be any problem at all putting a Raq on an ADSL line.  ADSL
>will provide the same top level TCP/IP availability as any network line.
>The problem with ADSL is, as its name states, that it is asynchronis.  It
>is a lot slower upstream then it is downstream.  I would say 99% of our
>Raq's use is upstream traffic... making the slowest part of your ADSL line
>the heaviest part used by the Raq.
>
>If that isn't a problem and you have plenty of bandwidth (can you ever
>really have enough?), then a Raq would work fine.  If not, and you still
>want the savings, check out SDSL.  It is the big brother to ADSL and will
>give you faster speeds in both directions for about $500 cheaper per month
>then a T1.  Of course, those are prices relative to my area, your results
>may differ.
>
>Jim 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cobalt-users mailing list
>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>