[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location
- From: "Studds McButt" <studds@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri Aug 8 10:07:05 2003
- List-id: Discussion Forum for developers on Sun Cobalt Networks products <cobalt-developers.list.cobalt.com>
Thanks David. I archive that list but don't read it regularly, so I'll
take a look.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David
Lucas
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 12:53 PM
To: cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location
check the users list. Over the last 8 months there are over 70 posts
dealing with raqport
I could forward you a few if you need
At 11:34 AM 8/7/2003, you wrote:
>Thanks Jon. After an extensive search of providers of co-location
>services in Ontario, we found none that could offer adequate bandwith
>at a competitive price, let alone raq-specific service. We use only
>about 25 GB of transfers a month, but we need burstable bandwidth,
>which raqport offers. Also, we prefer to deal with a Cobalt specialist,
>and we need 24/7/365 reboots. Cobaltracks is very price competitive but
>offers no telephone service. They take several hours to respond to an
>on-line trouble ticket and that's when their ticket interface is
>actually working. There is no service at all on Sundays. The raqs
>themselves have never failed, but we have had repeated connectivity
>problems. We have been running a pair of mirrored Raq4s at cobaltracks,
>but have now come to the conclusion that preventing hacker attacks has
>displaced hardware failure as the principal threat to our business.
>Therefore, we want the raq550-specific security services that raqport
>offers. They have offered us a competivie package and our only concern
>is that we know nothing about the company, and they offer no details on
>their website. We're looking for a long-term relationship and we would
>prefer to know who we were dealing with. Ken
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cobalt-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:cobalt-developers-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ontario
>Web System Administrator
>Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 11:52 AM
>To: cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location
>
>
>Hi Ken,
>I do not know much about raqport other then I have seen them on the net
>for a few years.
>
>I am just wonder why you do not just upgrade your Raq you have now to a
>550?
>
>There are also many good colocate facilities here right in Ontario. "
>Not trying to take away from Raqport "
>
>We have just opened a new data center with Digital Networks in
>Smithfalls that is working out really well.
>
>PS: for reference ....I am just located in Brockville Area
>
>--
>Best Regards, Jon
>
>System Administrator & Lead Developer
>< http://www.ontarioweb.ca > 1-866-209-0349
>< hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>
>===========================================
>The contents hereof may be a privileged and
>confidential communication. Unauthorized use
>is prohibited. If you have received this message
>in error, return e-mail immediately and delete
>the original.
>
>Thank you for your cooperation.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Studds McButt" <studds@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:18 AM
>Subject: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location
>
>
> > Has anyone had experience with raqport?
> >
> > We are considering moving from cobaltracks (Visual Link) where we
> > have
>
> > a raq4i, to raqport and upgrading to a raq550 at the same time.
> >
> > The purpose of the move is to get better service, mainly telephone
> > requests for reboots, software installations and automatic security
> > upgrades.
> >
> > We plan to buy the 550 from raqport and co-locate it there. But I
> > can't find any background information on the company.
> >
> > Any information -- good or bad -- would be helpful.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Ken Waldie
> > The Media Works
> > Kingston, Canada
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-developers mailing list cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by Ontario Webs MailScanner, and is believed to be
> > clean.
> >
> >
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>cobalt-developers mailing list cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cobalt-developers mailing list cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
>
>--
>This message has been scanned for viruses and
>dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
cobalt-developers mailing list cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers