Jonathan Michaelson wrote:
So if someone has not yet applied this patch, all one has to do is first apply 16343 first and then 16622 and no worries? Or should one back up some 'httpd binaries' first? I'm wondering what those binaries are (sorry if it is obvious - sometimes I don't get it) and maybe I would back them up first.If you reply to my email address I'd be happy to send you the pre-package httpd binaries which you can simply replace the "new" ones with. This effectively backs off the problems and has resolved the issue for me. -- Regards, Jonathan Michaelson
Or maybe it makes no sense to consider 16622? thanks for any advice for this 'someone'. -- Jim D.