[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Disks when upgrading xtr to 550
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Disks when upgrading xtr to 550
- From: josh <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Nov 19 10:52:01 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
I hope you get this - I've been using a RaQ 3i as a temporary server
-- but I wound up not testing thoroughly enough and tried to upgrade
too soon.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:27:53PM -0600, Chris L wrote:
> I originally ported my XTR to a 550. Because I had 4x80 Gigs in my XTR I
> wanted to continue using RAID5. Since the OSRCD wouldn't allow me to do it,
> I rebuilt the CD and forced the cd to setup RAID5. It worked, but after
> doing more extensive toying with the server, it seemed a bit sluggish,
> especially when rebuilding a failed drive. I don't know what the cause of
> the lag was; I never really spent much time looking for it. I just went
> ahead and pulled two of the 4 drives out of the server, and then restored it
> again with RAID 1. Since then, I've been running the 550 OS and all cobalt
> kernel updates and patches and have seen no negatives. You might want to
> consider doing this as well.
> Everything you posted looks good to me, but I would be hesitant on using
> RAID 0 unless I really needed the speed or disk space more than I needed
> redundancy.
>
I though about it -- but I realized that the only things that I use
the server for are 1. web server 2. mail server 3. mysql database
server. 4. squid proxy and whatever I gain in redundancy I wind up
losing from adding overhead to the proxy.
Guess I'll go for it -- let me know if you get this even if you've
nothing to add.
--
Josh Kuperman
josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx