[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] 2ndary mail server?
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] 2ndary mail server?
- From: Greg Hewitt-Long <cobaltusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Aug 25 14:50:02 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> > I have a client whose mailserver is provided by another company -
>> we host their site on a dedicated RAQ, while another company
>> handles their mail.
>>
>> This other company says that the SoBig virus is coming in at such
>> a rate, that their mailserver can't cope.
>>
>> Their dedicated server has mailscanner, but none of the user
>> accounts setup...
>>
>> how can we change it so that their mail first hits their
>> dedicated server, we mailscanner it - remove the viruses etc, and
>> pass it through to their 2ndary mailserver? Any ideas welcomed -
>> they are getting a little upset about their mail situation -
>> which I completely understand!
>>
>> I was thinking that we need to simply setup a catchall on the
>> machine this end, then create an MX record for this server, with
>> a HIGHER priority mailserver setting. Wouldn't that cause mail
>> to be collected here, scanned, then passed for final collection
>> to the existing mailserver?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Greg Hewitt-Long
>
>Hi Greg,
>Wouldn't you be better setting up a dummy domain name with an MX pointed at
>that vsite then scanning, with that site then forwarding individual user
>accounts?
The list of email aliases is massive - they already have windoze server handling it all - I'm just trying to help them out with the mail problem by using this RAQ4/500/512Mb as a first pass to remove the SoBig and other viruses, and pass it through to the destination server - it's their dedicated server, and they only use about 10Gb of traffic a month, the server is sat 99.95% idle, it's a perfect server to use, but I recall some talk about 2ndary MXs some time back, and a higer priority server will have the mail passed to it by a lower priority server I think.
>I've not tried the way you are suggesting, but I would have thought relaying
>to the same domain name might make the Raq protest since you could have
>mails effectively looping infinately.
Why? If they already have:
MX - mail.theirdomain.com - high priority
and I setup
MX www.theirdomain.com - highest priority
seem sound - but it's been a hard day! ;{)
>
>Phil
>
>
>** http://www.diygear.com THE Online DIY Toolstore For DIY & Business
>** Infolink Electronic Systems Ltd. http://www.infolinkelectronics.co.uk
>** Professional Web Design & Cobalt Hosting Solutions
>** Sun Cobalt iForce Reseller - Canon Silver Reseller
>** Contact: Sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>** Tel / Fax 0121 458 4894 (office) 0121 441 3558 (home)
>
>
>_____________________________________
>cobalt-users mailing list
>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--
E-Commerce Software & Web Design Services. http://webyourbusiness.com
Reliable Web Hosting from $4.99/month - http://www.aaabusinesshosting.com/
Domain Registration from $13/year - http://aaabusinesshosting.com/domains/
TF: 1-877-416-8655 PH: (970) 266-0195 FAX: (970) 266-0158