WAY-OT Re: [cobalt-users] Wacky Wednesday turns Insane Wednesday

["Dave's List Addy" <listonly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 8/13/03 5:28 PM, "Dan Kriwitsky" wrote:

Is it really required to carry this out this far??

Brian puts out a much wanted product and now every is on the reply kick.

>>>> Rather impossible in this case, you clearly state
>>>> any responses to you are immediately ignored and therefore
>> HAVE to be 
>>>> placed in this forum.  Pot, kettle, black, checkmate.
>>> 
>>> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2003-August/094594.html
>> 
>> Do you sleep with copies of the Archives or what?
> 
> No, but I know how to search them.
> 
>>>> 
>>>> Incorrect.  I'd do exactly what you and several
>>>> other posters to this List did and check the thing out if I had a
>>>> need for that particular product.
>>> 
>>> No, you're wrong again. If I got such an unsolicited
>> commercial email I
>>> would have sent a complaint to his ISP.
>> 
>> I'm sorry Dan, wasn't your question 'what would YOU
>> do?' and not 'here's what Dan would do, forget everyone
>> else?'. Review or delete, that's my position.  Yours,
>> obviously, is different.  We're both entitled to that.  But
>> don't spin it.
> 
> Sorry, I misread your reply to be "what you and several other posters to
> this list "would" do" instead of "did".
> 
>> 
>>> The list owner, at the time, posted very clear guidelines
>> and I don't 
>>> think the current list owner has stated they no longer apply.
>>> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2002-June/071380.html
>> 
>> I've had direct communications with Craig the last time
>> you threw a fit in these directions.  I had his answer,
>> wasn't aware there was a change in the Guard at this point.
> 
> There wasn't a change since Craig. Craig took the list over from Bruce.
> Craig indicated the list might go away at a whim from Sun and he's not
> taking an active role. Just leaving the status-quo IIRC. I don't recall
> him saying that any of the rules had changed, and I thought he or the
> list sent out the Meta FAQ to anyone who signs up.
> 
>> But I must ask again, did you print the entire Archive
>> for fast reference in these types of replies?  It's not the
>> first time I've seen this practice, so I'm seriously curious
>> to figure this out...
> 
> I just happened to recall Bruce's post and searched the archive for
> Timberlake advertising. There's the thread. (And a good name for a new
> ad agency.)
> Why you have such a fascination with me and what I do or don't do is in
> itself fascinating. I'm not sure how a printed version of the archive
> would be of any use anyway. Sounds slow. Risks paper cuts.
> 
>> 
>> Gotcha!  So where did you fit in again?
>> 
> 
> Somewhere below your 10 line non-sig sig I guess.

-- 
Thanks!!
David Thurman
List Only at Web Presence Group Net