RE: [cobalt-users] Wacky Wednesday turns Insane Wednesday

["Dan Kriwitsky" <list1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >> 	Rather impossible in this case, you clearly state
> >> any responses to you are immediately ignored and therefore 
> HAVE to be 
> >> placed in this forum.  Pot, kettle, black, checkmate.
> >
> >http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2003-August/094594.html
> 
> 	Do you sleep with copies of the Archives or what?

No, but I know how to search them.

> >>
> >> 	Incorrect.  I'd do exactly what you and several
> >> other posters to this List did and check the thing out if I had a 
> >> need for that particular product.
> >
> >No, you're wrong again. If I got such an unsolicited 
> commercial email I 
> >would have sent a complaint to his ISP.
> 
> 	I'm sorry Dan, wasn't your question 'what would YOU
> do?' and not 'here's what Dan would do, forget everyone 
> else?'. Review or delete, that's my position.  Yours, 
> obviously, is different.  We're both entitled to that.  But 
> don't spin it.

Sorry, I misread your reply to be "what you and several other posters to
this list "would" do" instead of "did".

> 
> >The list owner, at the time, posted very clear guidelines 
> and I don't 
> >think the current list owner has stated they no longer apply. 
> >http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2002-June/071380.html
> 
> 	I've had direct communications with Craig the last time
> you threw a fit in these directions.  I had his answer, 
> wasn't aware there was a change in the Guard at this point. 

There wasn't a change since Craig. Craig took the list over from Bruce.
Craig indicated the list might go away at a whim from Sun and he's not
taking an active role. Just leaving the status-quo IIRC. I don't recall
him saying that any of the rules had changed, and I thought he or the
list sent out the Meta FAQ to anyone who signs up.
 
> 	But I must ask again, did you print the entire Archive
> for fast reference in these types of replies?  It's not the 
> first time I've seen this practice, so I'm seriously curious 
> to figure this out...

I just happened to recall Bruce's post and searched the archive for
Timberlake advertising. There's the thread. (And a good name for a new
ad agency.)
Why you have such a fascination with me and what I do or don't do is in
itself fascinating. I'm not sure how a printed version of the archive
would be of any use anyway. Sounds slow. Risks paper cuts.

> 
> 	Gotcha!  So where did you fit in again?
> 

Somewhere below your 10 line non-sig sig I guess.
-- 
C2003 Dan Kriwitsky

Please reply to the list only. Off list replies are not read.