RE: [cobalt-users] Urgent: Mail Relaying with no relaying Allowed :(

[Matthew.Overall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Many thanks Gerald (as ever)!
I added under the auto cobalt bit:

217.199.176.53       550 Mail rejected due to possible SPAM

Which works. Which is better?

Matty

-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald Waugh [mailto:gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 20 June 2003 15:24
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Urgent: Mail Relaying with no relaying Allowed :(


On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Bas van Ecke wrote:
> > Ignore that last bit. The relay IP is someone in our range...
> >
> > We are
> > ***.***.76.76
> > ***.***.76.77
> >
> > The relaying is coming from
> > ***.***.76.53

iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s ***.***.76.53 --dport 25 -j REJECT


Gerald
--
http://frontstreetnetworks.com | http://store.raqware.com
  Front Street Networks LLC, 229 Front Street, Ste.#C
  New Haven, CT 06513-3203 | phone: +1-203-785-0699

_____________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to: http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.  If you have received this mail in error please notify
the system manager.
 
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been virus
checked.
**********************************************************************