[cobalt-users] Re: Malformed email address on Qube3

[Peter Frederick <pfred@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:21:33 +0800, you wrote:

><< Maybe the message from omf.net was actually spam and the reply-to address
>was deliberately munged! >>

Maybe I didn't express myself clearly enough!

Reply-to addresses are not validated - it's easy to receive messages that
look like they came from somewhere else.

>
>The original email was sent by ME! and I do not spam - so nice try.  Have a
>look at my email address and the example I gave and maybe you'll see why I
>find it insulting that you made a statement like that.

Maybe you should be less hasty to take offense! I was only making a
suggestion that maybe would help you solve your problem. 

>
>Any I did look at the headers and they revealed no clues that I could use.

Maybe if you posted them all here instead of just the 550 I wouldn't have
made that suggestion either :*)