[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 - Kernel 2.4 Upgrade Woes
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 - Kernel 2.4 Upgrade Woes
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Apr 8 20:13:00 2003
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
JT> Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:53:43 -0500 (CDT)
JT> From: Josh Trutwin
JT> request_module[block-major-3]: Root fs not mounted). Seems
JT> odd, the ROM kernel wasn't changed, it should still have IDE
JT> drivers...
Different CHS translations? Can you supply us with the disk
geometry of the drive you installed, as it was detected by the
host machine?
JT> 1.) Does it matter that I'm using an Athlon K6 to build this?
Uh, Athlon != K6. Athlon is the successor to K6.
JT> I don't have a good grasp on the architecture of the Raq4,
JT> but I read in one of the instructions to use a spare PIII.
JT> Will an Athlon work? (it's i386 right?) If not, will a PIV
JT> work, no PIII sitting around....
Compile for Pentium or K6 architecture. Do not use instructions
introduced in PII/PIII/P4/Athlon, such as CMOVxx. If you stick
with "-march=pentium" or "-march=k6" or earlier, you'll be fine.
JT> 3.) Does it matter where in the hard drive /dev/hda1 is?
JT> Somewhere I think I remember reading to use the last
JT> cylinders of the hard drive. I used the beginning of the
JT> hard drive during my partitioning.
Until IDE drivers are loaded, one is confined to the first 1024
cylinders. Having a kernel in ROM helps. ;-)
JT> FYI, I have a copy of the output from attempting to boot at
JT> http://trutwins.homeip.net/raq4.txt that might be helpful.
Hmmmm. "Unable to mount root fs on 03:01", which is /dev/hda1.
Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.