RE: [cobalt-users] .med tld - which method is best?

["E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:20:45 -0500
> From: jale

[ snipped heavily ]


> I found the write-up below on new.net - I am thinking of using
> option #3 - does anyone see this as bad, should I use one of
> the other ones for any particular reason? Any reason doing this
> at all is bad? I don't need the new domain name that much, but
> for my industry it would be nice to use.

> 3) Alternatively, you may slave the root zone, ".", from a
> master DNS server.

You are a webhost, yes?  It's up to ISPs to furnish DNS for their
users... I assume (and hope!) you aren't accepting recursive
queries from random people.

Will you also support any other alternate DNS root that comes
along?  I can think of at least one other in existence.

This topic is a bit of a messy one that quickly becomes OT for
this list. %^\


Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.