[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] NAS as additional/secondary storage?



At 03:08 PM 1/29/2003 -0500, you wrote:
"Greg Hewitt-Long" <cobaltusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Has anyone ever linked up a NAS or used NFS across a local
> network (preferably using the 2nd NIC) to provide storage to a RAQ?

I've done it via NFS via our internal network.

> possibly a couple of RAQs with 2 x 60Gb or 80Gb drives

If you're simply looking for storage space accessible via the network,
unless you have the RaQs already and have no other use for them, you're as
well off (or better) using something Pentium class machines with low RAM and
large drives running something like Red Hat 7.3 and minimal services.  It
would certainly be a lot less expensive, probably as effective and more
secure everything else being equal.  But then again, I'm a big fan of old
ugly hardware.  ;-)
--SNIP--

That's what I've done: PII-300Mhz, 192MB, 1.2GB HD for the OS, mount 80GB HD on /home. rsync data over SSH from 20 servers. Rotate drives as budget and disaster recovery dictates. The backup server hangs on my DMZ to backup internal and external servers.

Cheers,
Glenn Parsons