Re: [cobalt-users] what is the best..Spamassasin? Mailscanner?

["ISEE Multimedia" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

HI Paul,

Yes the domain is already registered (.co.uk) here is the whois output for
the domain, it looks like your client already owns this.

    Domain Name:
        nigeltheclown.co.uk

    Registrant:
        Nigel The Clown
        Trading As: Nigel Woodley T/A Nigel The Clown

    Registrant's Agent:
        Simply.Com Ltd [Tag = SIMPLYNAMES]
        URL: http://www.simply.com

    Relevant Dates:
        Registered on:  15-Nov-2000
        Last updated:   15-Jun-2002

    Name servers listed in order:
        ns.simplynames.co.uk              195.224.95.198
        ns2.simplynames.co.uk             81.3.64.21

    WHOIS database last updated at 02:35:00 08-Oct-2002

You can always request a change of the nameservers to point to our, this is
simple and easy to do, and we can then host your site for you. Would you
like us to still set up the hosting account?

Kind Regards.

Mark Priest
ISEE Multimedia

Web - http://www.isee-multimedia.co.uk
Email - mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Office - +44 0 1245 463937
Mobile - +44 0 7801 790944

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Lasman" <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] what is the best..Spamassasin? Mailscanner?


> Mirko wrote:
>
> > I see for my raq4, i have the choice between Spammassasin and
Mailscanner.
>
> Looking for a free anti-spam solution?  We've installed two DNSBLs...
> spamcop and ORDBS.
>
> While spamcop says it shouldn't be used in production system, lots of
> ISPs use it; we've never had a false positive come to our attention.
>
> Looking for a full-service solution?  We really like the SolarSpeed
> product; in fact we sell it to our clients, and many of them like it to.
>
> SolarSpeed's solution allows the spam onto your system, then tests it.
> So if anything it uses more server resources than just leaving spam
> alone.  The DNSBLs block it; the spam never gets to your server, so your
> system uses less resources.
>
> Of course the DNSBLs control spam based on where it's coming from, not
> from examining it.
>
> Nevertheless it makes for a lot lower load on our servers, and we and
> some of our clients appera to be happy with it.
>
> You could of course use both; some people do.
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
> nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA  92517
> voice: +1 909 778-9980  *  fax: +1 909 548-9484
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>