[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ2's
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ2's
- From: "DutchNet Support" <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Aug 22 17:21:01 2002
- Organization: DutchNet
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Hi,
I do not know about others but we have seen RaQ'2 machine handling more hits
and traffic with 256Mb memory then any of our RaQ4's with 512Mb memory.
cheers
Erik Venema
DutchNet Internet
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kameel" <kameel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 5:24 PM
Subject: [cobalt-users] RaQ2's
> Heya,
>
> Does anyone know if it still worth getting RaQ2's ?
> What sort of performance comparison is there between RaQ2 & RaQ3 or a RaQ4
?
>
> I've been trawling around but haven't found any benchmarks, or anything
> that would give a reasonable comparison on "how much they can handle
> respectively"...
>
> Thanks,
> Kam.
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>