[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] RE: vacation message on a catchall? RaQ3
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] RE: vacation message on a catchall? RaQ3
- From: "Edward R. Milstein" <eddie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Aug 18 09:08:01 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
So can you explain what you did since it doesn't make sense to me...
-ed-
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cobalt-users-
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of FantasticMoms.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cobalt-users] RE: vacation message on a catchall? RaQ3
>
> > I guess I might be wrong but I thought the catch all worked the
other
> > way...
> >
>
> I have a catchall which seems to work just fine. It is set up as an
email
> alias @www.domain.com
> My problem is setting up a vacation message "domain wide". The owner
of
> this domain tends not to use the username of the catchall as his
return
> address, so the catchall is used to collect virtually 100% of the
email
> sent to the domain. When we set up the vacacion message on the
catchall
> account it will only work when the message is sent to that username,
not
> when it is sent to the name the message was actually sent to. Wow,
this
> seems really hard to explain.
>
> > Also are you talking about additions in the
/etc/mail/virtusertable???
>
> I haven't touched that.
>
> _____________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe/unsubscribe, or to SEARCH THE ARCHIVES, go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users