[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] Weirdest memory problem yet...
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Weirdest memory problem yet...
- From: "Peter Masloch" <peter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Jul 4 04:52:01 2002
- Organization: EasyniX Consulting
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Jeff,
Everything looks very good. No need to worry. :-)
I just don't understand why Machine 60 does not show
a Swap partition. At normal the SUN/Cobalt-OS CD will create
a 128 MB swap partition.
What is it showing if you do a "df" on machine 60?
Peter
> "E.B. Dreger" wrote:
>
> > Not inherently alarming. No swap being used, and plenty of
> RAM used
> > for buffers and cache. Free memory does no good; buffers and cache
> > are useful.
>
> Thanks to both Eddy and to Peter, for making me feel a bit
> better <smile>.
>
> Interesting to note that free memory went up quite a bit
> after the client switched AMD CPUs between two RaQ4s...
>
> Here's an example from about a half-hour ago:
>
> Machine 60:
> total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
> Mem: 529522688 74301440 455221248 76197888 6545408 33390592
> Swap: 0 0 0
> MemTotal: 517112 kB
> MemFree: 444552 kB
> MemShared: 74412 kB
> Buffers: 6392 kB
> Cached: 32608 kB
> SwapTotal: 0 kB
> SwapFree: 0 kB
----------<snip a lot of stuff>------------