Re: [cobalt-users] Weirdest memory problem yet...

["E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

JL> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 09:37:03 -0700
JL> From: Jeff Lasman


JL> We've got lots of RaQ4s that work fine, and one that doesn't.

Anything in particular?  C'mon, Jeff, narrow it down for us. ;-)


JL> Here's the cat /proc/meminfo taken a few minutes ago; note
JL> the "MemFree" line:
JL> 
JL> <snip>
JL>  [admin admin]$ cat /proc/meminfo
JL>          total:    used:    free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
JL>  Mem:  529522688 522850304  6672384 92987392 339124224 104116224
JL>  Swap:        0        0        0
JL>  MemTotal:    517112 kB
JL>  MemFree:       6516 kB
JL>  MemShared:    90808 kB
JL>  Buffers:     331176 kB
JL>  Cached:      101676 kB
JL>  SwapTotal:        0 kB
JL>  SwapFree:         0 kB
JL> </snip>

Not inherently alarming.  No swap being used, and plenty of RAM
used for buffers and cache.  Free memory does no good; buffers
and cache are useful.

What is the RaQ doing or not doing?


Eddy
--
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to
be blocked.