[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Raq550 vs Xserve
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Raq550 vs Xserve
- From: Bill Campbell <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat May 18 04:58:02 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 07:32:32AM -0700, C G wrote:
...
>As to whomever gets into the G4vsPIII ghz microdifferences "crushing one
>or the other" most webhosters etc. never run software that can take
>advantage of anything above a ghz so it's a moot point - hw reliability in
>general, memory, and drive space and how much expense and hassle or lack
>thereof, is it to get the product supported or not , are the pertinent
>specs to be concerned about.
My initial reaction when I saw the specs on the Xserver last
Tuesday was that they were aimed at graphics type applications,
and wouldn't be all that good for web/email servers because they
don't use SCSI hard drives. Then again it appears that the new
Cobalts are going this route as well.
Bill
--
INTERNET: bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/
``We shouldn't elect a President; we should elect a magician.''
Will Rogers