[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] Raq550 vs Xserve



On Sat, May 18, 2002 at 07:32:32AM -0700, C G wrote:
...
>As to whomever gets into the G4vsPIII ghz microdifferences "crushing one
>or the other" most webhosters etc. never run software that can take
>advantage of anything above a ghz so it's a moot point - hw reliability in
>general, memory, and drive space and how much expense and hassle or lack
>thereof,  is it to get the product supported or not , are the pertinent
>specs to be concerned about.

My initial reaction when I saw the specs on the Xserver last
Tuesday was that they were aimed at graphics type applications,
and wouldn't be all that good for web/email servers because they
don't use SCSI hard drives.  Then again it appears that the new
Cobalts are going this route as well.

Bill
--
INTERNET:   bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
UUCP:               camco!bill  PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
FAX:            (206) 232-9186  Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
URL: http://www.celestial.com/

``We shouldn't elect a President;  we should elect a magician.''
    Will Rogers