[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- From: Grant Stern <grantstern@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Apr 4 14:50:11 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
John D. Gorena wrote:
>Hey why not get a WindowZ 1U Rack running Windows 2K Server patch it up
>very easy to do so...
Good objective article John. I agree, cobalt is cost effective in time.
Maybe its not perfect, but if it cooked and cleaned too, this might be a "So
I married a Cobalt box" list.
You forgot to mention the need to patch after all changes for little
unimportant patches like Nimda Virus (something else of little worry to Blue
users) or Code Red (there are unix worms). I have seen folks get their
win2k zorched after installing the patch, then not updating again. In fact,
keeping a win box running takes a lot of attention. Far more than even my
little raq 2 does.
grant
--
3052190326@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
305-219-0326
1799 NE 4th Ave.
#25
Miami, Fl. 33132
http://heybartender.org
Mixing Modern Marketing and High Impact Design