[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- From: BSmith@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue Apr 2 08:03:21 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: John D. Gorena
Jeff,
Thanks for the response . . . But if that is the case, then why spend so
much
on a RAQ4 if I can build a PC that will do the same for much much less?
What about the network card? Is it just a 100 Mbs card?
Why the cost difference?
John
Brian Has This TO say:
John,
Because the "normal" admin/ISP/hoster/whatever is either lazy, stupid (when
it comes to hosting, etc), or needs a solution that can do EVERYTHING with
NO SETUP, No Hassles, etc.
I run both a Linux PC, and a Raq 4r. I like the Raq because I have yet to
experience a big hassle that I haven't been able to fix, I really like it
because I can do ASP on it, and use it for development. If I want to run
ASP on my Linux Box, I need to buy ChiliSoft!, with the Raq4r, I get the
updates for FREE.
Best example,
Do you know much about cars?
If YES -> Why do you buy them, why not build one?
Answer, COST EFFECTIVENESS ... It is easier to use something prebuilt.
~Brian.