[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
- From: "Roy A. Urick" <rurick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Apr 3 10:25:03 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Lasman" <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Raq4 verses Linux PC
> "Roy A. Urick" wrote:
>
> > In my research (this is all on paper, havent built it yet), I can put
> > together a Redhat based 1u system equivalent to the raq's performance
for
> > marginally more ($400) using Redhat, and plesk for the GUI.
>
> RedHat is free. Plesk isn't. The 30-site version is $199, the 300-site
> version is $599.
>
> so add $600 for the Plesk license, and you're at $1,000. And there's an
> annual support contract if you want support.
>
> And it's got limitations, just like Cobalt. Cobalt you know, Plesk you
> don't.
>
> I'm NOT knocking Plesk; It's an excellent package; my ex-partner runs
> thousands of sites with it. Just don't think it's the greatest thing
> since sliced bread... do your homework.
Agreed. its not a perfect solution, but personally, I feel it takes the day
to day management and setup up near the ease of use of a cobalt.
besides, isnt the PERFECT solution w2k and IIS5? ;)
/sarcasm
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
> nobaloney.net
> P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
> voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>