[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cobalt-users] Trouble with cathcall email



I am having trouble setting up a Catchall email account for a domain on a
Raq4r.  I followed the instructions in the manual "enter
"@hostname.domainname" in the Email alias window" but they do not work.  The
domain name is listed in email server parameters and it is not a Cname.  Any
suggestions?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [SMTP:cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 13, 2002 9:27 AM
> To:	cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:	cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #4035 - 15 msgs
> 
> Send cobalt-users mailing list submissions to
> 	cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cobalt-users digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. RE: root access (Andy Brown)
>    2. Re: root access (David Lucas)
>    3. RE: Qube 3 Samba upgrade? (Andy Brown)
>    4. RE: Apache DNS lookups (Andy Brown)
>    5. RE: TCP fragment (Andy Brown)
>    6. Re: Apache DNS lookups (Jelmer Jellema)
>    7. [RaQ4] Ready to use OS update 2.0 (Jelmer Jellema)
>    8. DNS not on my server but site is (Andy Jacobs)
>    9. AW: [cobalt-users] root access (CMO - Thorsten Mitschele)
>   10. RE: POP before SMTP? where? (Dan Kriwitsky)
>   11. RE: Vendor's Stick Together? (Dan Kriwitsky)
>   12. Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] POP before SMTP? where? (Gerald Waugh)
>   13. Re: root access (DenIT Internet Services [Thijs])
>   14. help with security (Mike Gibson)
>   15. How To Install Updates? (List)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] root access
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:10:09 -0000
> From: "Andy Brown" <andy.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> > 
> > More dumb questions...
> > 
> > when I try to "su root" using my admin password, I'm told 
> > it's incorrect.
> > 
> > how do I get root access to my own machine?
> > 
> > Rick
> > 
> 
> Not necessarily a dumb question, I recently had a Qube3 that was rebuilt
> using the restore CD, and somehow I ended up with my own password for
> the admin account (Web interface, admin user account, etc) BUT whenever
> I su'd up to root, it was the wrong password. I tried everything, and in
> the end I accidentally typed admin at the su - prompt and it worked!
> So try putting in ADMIN in case something has gone amiss, after doing
> that make sure you set the password correctly using passwd.
> 
> Also, don't forget the possibility of a hacker, so make sure you are NOT
> using telnet, use SSH instead, and general security procedures.
> 
> Regards,
> andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://ineedlinux.info/
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:14:45 -0600
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: David Lucas <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] root access
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> At 01:37 AM 2/13/2002, you wrote:
> >More dumb questions...
> >
> >when I try to "su root" using my admin password, I'm told it's incorrect.
> >
> >how do I get root access to my own machine?
> >
> >Rick
> 
> 
> Change the password in the GUI for the administrator
> It will change the password for admin and root
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 3
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Qube 3 Samba upgrade?
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:15:13 -0000
> From: "Andy Brown" <andy.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
>  
> > In message <B88FCEFC.6CEB5%mmcleary@xxxxxxx>, Malcolm McLeary 
> > <mmcleary@xxxxxxx> writes
> > >Hi Jason,
> > >
> > >on 13/2/02 12:08 AM, Jason Crouch at lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'm keen to deploy a roving profiles system on our network 
> > (everyone 
> > >> wants their own Outlook on every desk), and can achieve this 
> > >> relatively easily (for some values of ... ) using Samba 2.2.3a to 
> > >> transform a RH6.2 box into a PDC with (fairly) full w2k domain 
> > >> support.
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > >To the best of my knowledge this is possible with a Qube3 
> > straight out 
> > >the box.  It fact it was supported on the Qube2 as well.
> > 
> > Knew there was something I'd forgotten to mention!  Most of 
> > the clients 
> > are W2k so (as you later say) they pretty much want a real PDC :(
> 
> 
> To the best of my knowledge if you already know the Samba version that
> you can do this with (I've not done this, although its sparked an
> inspiration to try it) RPM packages of samba.
> The Qube's use an Intel architecture, so you'll find that just getting
> an RPM of the version you want and installing that should do the job.
> 
> Depending on how often you use/need to use the web-based admin, then it
> may be worth getting a source tar ball instead of RPM and compiling it
> to use a different smb.conf/smbpasswd etc file location so that you can
> make changes, and each time something changes on the web admin interface
> it doesn't overwrite your config file.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://ineedlinux.info/
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 4
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Apache DNS lookups
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:21:27 -0000
> From: "Andy Brown" <andy.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I'm running webalizer with DNS lookups on the web.log files. 
> > The DNS lookups take a long time (on average 150 
> > address/min). What implications would it have to switch on 
> > DNS lookups for Apache? 
> > IMO this would spread the load of doing the lookups or am I wrong?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Edwin
> 
> 
> Hi Edwin,
> I would recommend leaving your logs DNS work to be handled by Webalizer.
> The reason is because webalizer is an off-line package, i.e. it doesn't
> actually push data directly to site visitors, it simply runs, does its
> work and writes out html that can be viewed later.
> 
> Therefore it doesn't impact upon when people actually look at their log
> files/web sites. However, turning dns lookups ON in Apache DOES cause a
> slow-down, because apache has to deal with the DNS lookup, wait for the
> reply then log it. This can cause connections to view any web-page to
> slow down which is definitely undesirable.
> 
> As you mentioned spreading the work-load, it wouldn't achieve this as it
> would concentrate the load onto Apache, then webalizer would have an
> easy life since it wouldn't have to do any DNS look-ups.
> 
> One minor thing you could check, and that is what DNS server you're
> using in the /etc/resolv.conf and see if you can find one closer/faster
> to use if you think the DNS is a problem, although the timings you say
> seem pretty speedy to me.
> 
> Regards,
> andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://ineedlinux.info/
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 5
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] TCP fragment
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:44:31 -0000
> From: "Andy Brown" <andy.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> >   Any ideas of what the following message means?
> > 
> > Feb  8 00:19:35 ns kernel: Suspect TCP fragment.
> > Feb  8 00:19:35 ns kernel: eth0 PROTO=6 67.8.24.34:0 
> > 64.65.33.119:0 L=40 S=0x00 I=0 F=0x0001 T=237 (#0)
> > 
> >    Thanks for any help!
> > 
> Hi,
> 
> This is a possible attempted DOS attack on your machine, so you should
> make sure your firewall is in place and doing its job.
> In the kernel source there is a little blurb about it:
> 	  /*
>          *      Don't allow a fragment of TCP 8 bytes in. Nobody
>          *      normal causes this. Its a cracker trying to break
>          *      in by doing a flag overwrite to pass the direction
>          *      checks.
>          */
> 
> 
> Regards,
> andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://ineedlinux.info/
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 6
> From: "Jelmer Jellema" <cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Apache DNS lookups
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:18:56 +0100
> Organization: Spin in het Web (www.spininhetweb.nl)
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Related to this: I tried to find a way to let webalizer do the DNS
> lookups,
> but the only thing I found was a script that turned the first field in
> every
> log line into a looked-up name. On cobalts this should be the *second*
> field, so I would have had to rewrite the script. I will one day, but for
> now I just turned on DNS-lookups by apache.
> 
> Question: Reading this thread I get the impression there is a simple way,
> like a config-directive, to tell webalizer to do DNS lookups. Is this
> true?
> 
> Jelmer
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Brown" <andy.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 10:21 AM
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Apache DNS lookups
> 
> 
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I'm running webalizer with DNS lookups on the web.log files.
> > > The DNS lookups take a long time (on average 150
> > > address/min). What implications would it have to switch on
> > > DNS lookups for Apache?
> > > IMO this would spread the load of doing the lookups or am I wrong?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Edwin
> >
> >
> > Hi Edwin,
> > I would recommend leaving your logs DNS work to be handled by Webalizer.
> > The reason is because webalizer is an off-line package, i.e. it doesn't
> > actually push data directly to site visitors, it simply runs, does its
> > work and writes out html that can be viewed later.
> >
> > Therefore it doesn't impact upon when people actually look at their log
> > files/web sites. However, turning dns lookups ON in Apache DOES cause a
> > slow-down, because apache has to deal with the DNS lookup, wait for the
> > reply then log it. This can cause connections to view any web-page to
> > slow down which is definitely undesirable.
> >
> > As you mentioned spreading the work-load, it wouldn't achieve this as it
> > would concentrate the load onto Apache, then webalizer would have an
> > easy life since it wouldn't have to do any DNS look-ups.
> >
> > One minor thing you could check, and that is what DNS server you're
> > using in the /etc/resolv.conf and see if you can find one closer/faster
> > to use if you think the DNS is a problem, although the timings you say
> > seem pretty speedy to me.
> >
> > Regards,
> > andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://ineedlinux.info/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 7
> From: "Jelmer Jellema" <cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Cobalt Users List" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:36:29 +0100
> Organization: Spin in het Web (www.spininhetweb.nl)
> Subject: [cobalt-users] [RaQ4] Ready to use OS update 2.0
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> At the risk of repeating a lot of other e-mails, I would like to find out
> if
> I'm save now to use the OS 2.0 update on my in-production RaQ. If I
> remember
> I've heard of the following problems:
> 
> - PHP should be re-installed (no problem)
> - eth0 dissapearing (quite a problem, as I should have to cycle to the
> other
> end of town to get access to the server, and so have all the people who
> want
> to visit the hosted websites)
> - problems with makewhatis
> - problems with catchall aliases
> - things I allready forgot?
> 
> Because people usualy only post when there is a problem I don't know if
> these issues appear often. My situation is: experencied unix sysop, not
> afraid to try thing, don't need a lot of extra work and cannot afford the
> system going offline too long.
> 
> My questions are:
> 
> (a) should I do the 2.0 update?
> (b) why?
> 
> Jelmer
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jelmer Jellema - Spin in het Web
>   www.spininhetweb.nl
>   Spin in het Web: Alle Touwtjes In Handen
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Spin in het Web is de producent van:
> www.visinhetnet.nl: Niet Het Laatste Nieuws
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 8
> From: "Andy Jacobs" <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Cobalt-Users" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:56:37 -0000
> Subject: [cobalt-users] DNS not on my server but site is
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Hopefully a simple one and I'll try and keep it to bullet points:
> 
> RAQ4
> Customer uses Easynet for ISP
> Domain name shows on Easynet's nameservers
> Web site is hosted on a box somewhere else
> I guess Easynet just redirect http requests to this other box
> Easynet handle all the e-mail for the domain
> 
> I may be off track but I guess they would set up an a record to point to
> my
> IP address.  I would then set up the site as normal with a records for
> www.domain.com and domain.com but _not_ mail.domain.com through the GUI.
> I
> guess I would then not need to set up mx records for the domain.  Would I
> need to set up anything else or just the a records?
> 
> Does any of this make sense?  Any help would be much appreciated.
> 
> Andy Jacobs
> Media Marks
> Web Design, Hosting, Site Promotion
> Tel: 023 9241 3880
> www.mediamarks.net
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 9
> From: "CMO - Thorsten Mitschele" <mitschele@xxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: AW: [cobalt-users] root access
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:16:37 +0100
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> As i figured out, you cant get root if you log on as a user different than
> admin.
> 
> You must be logged in first as admin user and su then to root
> 
> on all our machines this happens:
> 
> 1.
> log in as "someuser"
> su to root - wont work (password error)
> 
> 2.
> log in as "someuser"
> su to admin (works)
> su to root (doesnt work - password error)
> 
> 3.
> log in as "admin"
> su to root (works)
> 
> Can anyone tell my WHY Point 1 and 2 dont work?
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> 
> Thorsten Norman Mitschele
> Geschäftsführer
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> CMO Internet Dienstleistungen GmbH
> Postfach 13 35          72577 Dettingen / Erms
> Tel: 07123 / 72 67-0    Fax: 07123 / 72 67-150
> e-Mail: info@xxxxxx     Web: http://www.cmo.de
> 
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Rick Eames
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 08:37
> > An: Cobalt Users List
> > Betreff: [cobalt-users] root access
> >
> >
> > More dumb questions...
> >
> > when I try to "su root" using my admin password, I'm told it's
> incorrect.
> >
> > how do I get root access to my own machine?
> >
> > Rick
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 10
> From: "Dan Kriwitsky" <webhosting@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] POP before SMTP? where?
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:24:03 -0500
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> > And if you have a rediculous ISP like me (Verizon) you can't 
> > even send out through the ISPs SMTP unless your FROM address 
> > is a verizon.net address. Nice.
> > 
> 
> And the best thing is, anyone in the world can use Verizon's SMTP if
> they use a valid From address @verizon.net. Not quite an open relay, but
> pretty close.
> 
> -- 
> Dan Kriwitsky
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 11
> From: "Dan Kriwitsky" <webhosting@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Vendor's Stick Together?
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:25:39 -0500
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> *plonk*
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 12
> From: Gerald Waugh <gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] POP before SMTP? where?
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:58:39 -0500
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, List wrote:
> > Hello Steve,
> > 
> > I MUST BE NUTS OR BLIND? http://www.quantvantage.com/pop.gif
> > 
> > or  my  brand new raq4 must the be the improved idiots version without
> > the  pop  to  smtp  control?   another though is someone hacked in and
> > stole my pop to smtp setting, or you guys are playing a dirty trick on
> > me.  mark
> > 
> > 
> > SW> Control Panel, Parameters (next to Email Server), check POP Before
> SMTP
> > SW> Relaying and set Relay Window to # of minutes you want the POP
> > SW> authentication to keep relay privileges open.
> > 
> Look in controlPanel->Maintenance->InstallSoftware
> See if pop b4 smtp is listed.
> Your RaQ may not be up2date.
> If no go to http://cobalt.com/support/downloads.
> and get the pkg and install it.
> 
> --
> Gerald Waugh
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 13
> From: "DenIT Internet Services [Thijs]" <thijs@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] root access
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:14:45 +0100
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To su to root you have to be in the "wheel" group, admin in this case is,
> while other "normal" users on you machine are not.
> That is why case 1 and 2 don't work, and case 3 does :)
> 
> Regards,
> Thijs
> 
> 
> | As i figured out, you cant get root if you log on as a user different
> than
> | admin.
> |
> | You must be logged in first as admin user and su then to root
> |
> | on all our machines this happens:
> |
> | 1.
> | log in as "someuser"
> | su to root - wont work (password error)
> |
> | 2.
> | log in as "someuser"
> | su to admin (works)
> | su to root (doesnt work - password error)
> |
> | 3.
> | log in as "admin"
> | su to root (works)
> |
> | Can anyone tell my WHY Point 1 and 2 dont work?
> |
> | Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> |
> | Thorsten Norman Mitschele
> | Geschäftsführer
> |
> | ----------------------------------------------
> | CMO Internet Dienstleistungen GmbH
> | Postfach 13 35          72577 Dettingen / Erms
> | Tel: 07123 / 72 67-0    Fax: 07123 / 72 67-150
> | e-Mail: info@xxxxxx     Web: http://www.cmo.de
> |
> |
> | > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> | > Von: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Rick Eames
> | > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2002 08:37
> | > An: Cobalt Users List
> | > Betreff: [cobalt-users] root access
> | >
> | >
> | > More dumb questions...
> | >
> | > when I try to "su root" using my admin password, I'm told it's
> incorrect.
> | >
> | > how do I get root access to my own machine?
> | >
> | > Rick
> | >
> | >
> | > _______________________________________________
> | > cobalt-users mailing list
> | > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> | > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> | >
> | >
> |
> | _______________________________________________
> | cobalt-users mailing list
> | cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> | http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> |
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 14
> From: "Mike Gibson" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:48:27 -0600
> Subject: [cobalt-users] help with security
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> New to Linux but learning.....I continuously receive this message in
> /var/log/messages.  Would some of you help me out with how I go about
> fixing
> this?  Thanks for your help in advance!    //Mike Gibson
> 
> Feb 10 04:15:00 dsiinternet cced(smd)[28771]: client [0:28770] has admin
> rights
> Feb 10 04:30:00 dsiinternet cced(smd)[29548]: client [0:29547] has admin
> rights
> Feb 10 04:45:00 dsiinternet cced(smd)[30313]: client [0:30312] has admin
> rights
> Feb 10 04:51:27 dsiinternet cced(smd)[30671]: client [0:29165] has admin
> rights
> Feb 10 04:51:30 dsiinternet cced(smd)[30685]: client [0:29165] has admin
> rights
> Feb 10 04:51:38 dsiinternet cced(smd)[30698]: client [0:29165] has admin
> rights
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 15
> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:07:46 -0600
> From: List <list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cobalt-users] How To Install Updates?
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hello Gerald,
> 
> first  -  thanks  all you people for all the help.  while i am a total
> newbie  to  raq4 i do understand computers and the net somewhat.  i am
> completely  lost  at  what all you people are doing with these command
> lines you are posting.  i bought this machine so that i didn't have to
> do all that, and now find out i have a brand new out of date os raq4.
> 
> i  don't understand why sun didn't install the latest software on this
> machine.   anyway  can  someone post a 1-2-3- type Basic Step of how i
> put  all  those  friggin  patches  on  my  machine.  i have this thing
> plugged  into a router, and am puzzled how you guys are even finding a
> a place to type command lines in the browser interface?
> 
> ps  hoping you'll tell me this patch stuff is a simple pick and click?
> dreaming, dreaming?
> 
> mark brown
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  List                            mailto:list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> 
> 
> End of cobalt-users Digest