RE: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3] DNS primary and secondary on two RaQ3's

["Robert Fitzpatrick" <robert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Do you mean to say it doesn't matter whether the secondary is set-up as
a slave or >master? If not, in what cases *does* it matter?

Yes, I'd be interested to know that, too! I liked the idea of setting
them both as primaries and rsync'ing. Will it matter. I guess the only
reason you need to have them as secondary is so they will update
automatically after you enter them. But the rsync idea would be better,
you wouldn't even have to enter the secondary dns.

--
Robert