Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3] DNS primary and secondary on two RaQ3's

["E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:13:29 +0200
> From: Per Magne Knutsen <per.knutsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Do you mean to say it doesn’t matter whether the secondary is
> set-up as a slave or master?
> If not, in what cases *does* it matter?

Both "primary" and "secondary" servers are expected to return
authoritative results.

"Master" means that zone info is stored locally, and "slave"
means that it is pulled from the master.  One may use rsync as an
alternative to BIND's built-in AXFR.  (Note that djbdns requires
use of something like rsync, as it lacks built-in AXFR code.)

Grab a copy of the grasshopper book, BOG, or similar resource.


Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to be blocked.