[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Mail help on RAQ 4
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Mail help on RAQ 4
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Jan 20 12:20:52 2002
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
flash22@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Perhaps i should have made that a seperate sentence, sigh, the 'loop' is
> indicated by 'excessive recursion' during canonification ;P
Perhaps I should have read the original post more carefully. Sorry
about that.
> But note that this machine isn't supposed to be getting the mail in the
> first place, he has MX records pointing to pcnet1.pcnet.com and
> mail.maxsolns.com, presumably he intends these machines to handle that
> mail, the fact that the reporting MTA is 'chi...' tells me right there
> that the wrong machine got the mail, and it got it because the domain is a
> cname to another domain, so the MX records don't belong there...They were
> in fact, ignored by the client...
So, why could the wrong machine get the mail? Has to be a DNS problem,
right?
> I'd guess 'chi' has no clue what it's supposed to do with the mail and is
> doing something typicaly stupid like trying to add 'www' to the domain in
> the RCPT field hoping in vain that it eventually resolves to the name of
> an interface it is supposed to accept mail on ;p [I really love that
> cobalt 'feature', but we won't go there']
You're right of course. I can explain it well, but I don't have much
luck defending it <smile>.
> as to the his nameserver, it's an improvment, when i looked before, there
> was only 1 NS record for the domain, now he seems to have 3, 2 of which
> are duplicates ;P
>
> I think he needs to sit down and review his dns ;)
I agree. Thanks for clarifying.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484