Re: [cobalt-users] OT ish - real world cobalt server "serving" capacity comparisons.

["BT" <error404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> We use the Cobalt for hosting multiple websites; that's what it's
> designed for.  For specialty websites, complex database programming,
> lots of programmed pages as opposed to static pages, we go the Linux
> route.  You can do a 2U server (used) with roughly the same hardware
> specs as the RaQ4 in the neighborhood of $350.  You can do an awful lot
> better (new) at us$1,000 or thereabouts.

this makes little sense to me.......

for multiple websites you like cobalt.......

for speciality websites you like something that isn't cobalt but has
basically the same hardware and the same OS.....

so you are saying that the cobalt customisations, including the gui, make
this huge difference in performance??